And if you use css animations inside the svg (which totally works) instead of svg-smil animations, you can even get it working in IE10 So yes, my suggestion is still useful and it's still awesome. ![]() so I think that whatever works in browsers now, you can more or less rely on that working in future browsers as well. What it does mean though, is they are attempting to cut the feature's dependence on "SMIL", while retaining the currently implemented features. Just because Ian Hickson says the feature is deprecated doesn't mean that it is, or that browser devs will follow whatever he says. Just because IE is lagging behind doesn't mean this feature is cut. The implementation of this merging effort in chrome's blink rendering engine, and a rationalisation for this webanimation effort that promotes not a removal of the svg animation features (which are already implemented in everything but IE), but an expansion of their powers, being advocated by both google and mozilla But the damage was already done:Įvidence of actual standards activity and implementations from as recently as June 2014 show instead an active merging of css animation with svg animation into a single consistent model called "web animation" ![]() Indeed he followed up by removing the feature from the ACID3 test. To review, it would seem that while you have a blog post from ian hickson making a passive reference to deprecating smil.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |